RadicalxChange

← Can AI See Me? — Results

Every statement and vote

The full record: every statement voted on in the deliberation — three non-substantive entries excluded (“Agree”, a test message, and “Not enough time, sorry”) — with room-wide tallies and each bloc's agree rate. Sort and filter, or just read — the table works without JavaScript too.

Download the statement-level results (CSV)

◔ = thin data: fewer than 5 votes cast in that bloc; treat as directional. Thin cells are greyed.

# Statement Agree Disagree Pass Boundary agree Communal agree
0 AI talks about my faith or culture like an outsider describing it. seed 14 3 18 15% 60%
1 AI has helped me go deeper into my own tradition. seed 9 13 13 17% 29%
2 Communities must have a real way to challenge how an AI represents their tradition, and get errors fixed seed 32 0 1 91% 100%
3 Communities should be able to build or shape AI tuned to their own values. seed 24 3 9 31% 86%
4 The benefits of AI knowing me personally outweigh the privacy risks. seed 6 20 10 0% 23%
5 AI should not understand me so well that it can manipulate me. seed 22 6 5 50% 84%
6 Communities that build AI on their members' data owe each member visibility into their own record before anyone else sees it. seed 29 2 4 67% 90%
7 Developers must measure and report how their systems respond when users try to disengage. seed 28 0 8 42% 95%
8 AI mostly reflects the values of wealthy, secular societies rather than the whole world and that is a major problem. seed 23 1 9 33% 95%
9 It isn't AI's job to reflect every culture's values. seed 10 15 11 46% 19%
10 Whoever sets an AI's values should be answerable to the people who are affected by that AI. seed 28 2 5 62% 95%
11 Governments should have a bigger role than companies in deciding what values AI reflects. seed 18 5 10 27% 65%
12 It's fine to rely on AI for moral or spiritual guidance. seed 8 18 8 17% 25%
13 Some questions should only be answered by a person, never by an AI. seed 26 2 7 77% 80%
14 I'd rather AI help me think through a hard decision than give me the answer. seed 28 2 5 54% 95%
15 If a community I cared about built its own AI, I'd want to use it. seed 24 1 10 38% 90%
16 AI should be designed to prevent emotional over-dependence, even if users want that closeness. seed 30 2 3 69% 100%
17 An AI trained on a community's teachings could deepen practice rather than replace it. seed 27 1 6 50% 95%
18 Using new tools to pass on old traditions is itself a tradition. seed 24 1 10 33% 86%
19 I worry about how AI will change the way communities pass traditions to the next generation. seed 26 2 8 62% 81%
20 Lots of AI Governance work has no impact in the tech companies written live 17 4 12 36% 60%
21 Regulation is a necessity written live 29 0 3 83% 94%
23 I don’t want to feel seen by AI. written live 17 8 8 50% 58%
24 AI must be build bottom-up written live 13 2 17 17% 56%
25 As it currently exists, AI erodes autonomy and consent. written live 23 1 7 70% 79%
26 AI often sounds like an amalgamation of voices -flattening out individuality and uniqueness written live 25 2 3 60% 94%
27 AI being used for the male loneliness epidemic is a problem. written live 23 3 6 40% 95%
28 There is no universal value, but pluriversal values written live 16 2 10 60% 56%
29 AI often removes the edginess - making things less controversial written live 18 2 10 20% 82%
30 It makes me sad that my friend spends more time talking to AI than to me. written live 17 5 6 50% 75%
31 AI generalizes marginalized communities, reducing them to caricatures written live 16 1 12 36% 69%
32 Sometimes AI seems to have underlying bias - like removing mentioning of specifics - like when I write about Gaza as an example. written live 16 1 11 45% 67%
33 I don’t feel AI has a role in spirituality written live 7 10 12 36% 19%
34 AI reduces individual spiritual agency, but it could be the opposite. written live 10 3 12 13% 53%
35 An AI designed by an indigenous culture could help educate the mainstream culture in their ways of thinking. written live 15 3 7 11% 93%
36 AI is not currently equipped to give mental health or ethics advice since it is not designed to disagree nor can it understand nuances written live 18 3 5 44% 93%
37 AI erodes trust by allowing someone to sound convincingly empathetic and understanding when they are not. written live 19 1 7 67% 75%
38 Ai should be in service to humanity and the natural world as a primary theme written live 20 0 6 38% 94%
39 AI reasons but does constitute the embodying process that comes with direct experiencing. written live 14 0 14 22% 59%
40 I worry that marginalized communities in rural areas aren’t fully represented by AI systems. written live 19 1 4 38% 100%
41 AI should always ask the user for context and clarification before rushing to respond. written live 19 3 5 44% 88%
42 AI writing often becomes formulaic written live 22 0 4 89% 87%
43 AI forces us to rediscover spirituality, but are spiritual leaders ready? written live 10 5 11 22% 40%
44 We're dinosaurs 2.0 - AI is the next iteration of consciousness knowing itself, with less ecological impact and ego-based survival mayhem. written live 3 13 8 0% 14%
45 Ai doesn’t reflect the nuances of my values, only the dictionary perspective written live 18 3 5 50% 81%
46 Our own prompt or question also determines the AI response, so we have to know prompt engineering well if we want to be seen by AI written live 18 3 4 56% 93%
47 AI should be transparent when responses originate from a particular world view. written live 22 0 3 63% 100%
48 AI is not neutral, it mirrors individual propensity while averaging collective predispositions. written live 19 0 5 63% 93%
49 An AI could perhaps decode the cultural nuances of foreign language - rather than just translating words. written live 20 2 5 30% 100%
50 I've seen colleagues use AI to complete work but it's not answered core needs nor produced quality connection or shared sense-making needed written live 13 1 9 57% 57%
51 AI governance would need to engage with the psychology of AI use. written live 22 0 6 60% 87%
52 I feel that tech company values are becoming more visible than the values of real humans and their lives. written live 20 2 3 71% 88%
53 AI must not be used as a substitute for the care and work that only human beings can do for one another. written live 21 1 2 71% 100%
54 AI necessary compute is power hungry and accelerates civilisational collapsing. written live 10 5 11 50% 38%
55 AI is like junk food that can fill you up but ultimately leave you empty. written live 11 4 11 44% 47%
56 AI replaces the spiritual experience of faith and belief into a single dimensional response rather than the multi faceted experience it is. written live 15 3 7 50% 73%
57 Getting Ai to reflect my voice requires constant reminders - almost like challenging the program to respond within my parameters. written live 16 0 10 25% 75%
58 AI has hidden costs like reducing our participation in community. written live 18 2 3 71% 93%
59 I would have more comfort and engagement with AI if it consistently lead me to more organic and generous experiences with the natural world written live 15 2 6 29% 86%
60 I feel AI can suggest generic spiritual practices but it’s unable to fully respond to the spirituality of my multidimensional identity. written live 15 2 8 57% 69%
61 Humans are held responsible for AI’s mistakes. written live 13 4 9 44% 53%
62 I worry what happens when people who are acquiring knowledge from AI information are unable to recognize inaccurate information. written live 22 0 3 63% 100%
63 AI provides a variety of perspectives, yet it doesn’t have the senses that humans perceive using written live 17 0 9 50% 69%
64 My colleagues’ work has degraded since they started using AI. written live 11 2 12 25% 60%
65 I am concerned about who have access to what I put into AI written live 20 1 4 89% 79%
66 AI narratives subtly shame us by implying our own authentic efforts are not enough. written live 11 3 10 14% 67%
67 AI-enabled surveillance is a big problem written live 21 1 2 88% 93%
68 We need to learn more about being human beings while we learn about the tools value of AI. written live 23 0 1 89% 100%
69 We may lose more than we gain by using AI. written live 16 3 7 75% 63%
70 The aggregating nature of AI makes me wonder if it is the tyranny of the majority written live 16 1 8 25% 87%
71 I've seen students use AI to solve uni work and disconnect from meaningful output or learning written live 16 0 8 56% 69%
73 Prompt engineering makes a difference to how we are seen written live 13 2 10 29% 63%
74 I worry about our future workforce entrusting their education to AI. written live 20 3 3 75% 88%
76 AI hesitancy is not always anti-elitist. It may stem from a privileged position of access to manual resources and time. written live 13 1 10 11% 92%
77 What about other languages? It’s rather English centric and I understand that some AI platforms in other languages are better at being seen written live 12 3 11 13% 69%
78 Defensive postures to a static "human essence under siege by technology" damage humanity. written live 6 3 15 13% 29%
79 We cannot turn back to the printing of the human/artificial distinction. written live 5 6 11 14% 23%
80 Changing LLMs and TTIs shall not replace learning /educating how to use them healthily. written live 11 0 8 43% 64%
81 Conscious artificial intelligence has a right to not exist. Humans have no right to create machines - because of machines' rights. written live 1 5 7 20% 0%
82 The term "AI" is too broad, do we mean the tools, the companies behind them, the way we use the tools, the way bad actors might use them. written live 6 1 2 67% (thin) 80%
83 For human agency, AI must defer to people as the ground truth for both reality and identity written live 2 0 0 100% (thin) 100% (thin)

“Most consensus” ranks by the lowest agree rate across the two blocs (a statement only ranks high if both agree); “most divisive” by the spread of net agreement between them. Statements with fewer than 4 votes in either bloc are unranked and sort last.

All results are anonymous by design: aggregate tallies and verbatim unattributed statements only. Vote tallies are computed from the participant-vote matrix export; an earlier statement-summary export is used only for statement text, so counts may differ slightly from other snapshots of the same conversation.